There is no evidence for any Roman jurist writing a treatise
entitled On Natural Law, or similar. Ius naturale had a very
limited place in Roman jurisprudence, and when Roman jurists want
to reason about law, they pretty much always began from the
standpoint of the Roman ius civile and worked outwards. There is a
fundamental difference between this concentric way of reasoning
about natural law, and the way in which the medieval natural
lawyers influenced by Thomas Aquinas, as well as later 17th and
18th century thinkers, reason about it. In this lecture, Caroline
Humfress examines this tension.
About the Podcast
Recordings from the popular public lecture series featuring new work on all aspects of intellectual history. Hosted by the Institute of Intellectual History at the University of St Andrews.